logoSaving Communities
Bringing prosperity through freedom, equality, local autonomy and respect for the commons.
(This site is under construction. Please be patient)

Founderís Plan Benefits




There is no doubt in my mind that the (land) tax law has been a good thing for Pittsburgh. It has discouraged the holding of vacant land for speculation and provides an incentive for building improvements.... It is particularly beneficial to the home owners.

-- Pennsylvania Governor David L. Lawrence

The Founders' Plan

for property tax reform

PDF brochure version

Better Relief

Relief for all the elderly

The Foundersí Plan gives relief to all elderly residents. It does not give those with property more relief than those who rent, or give those with more property more relief than those with less.

No sales tax increases

Shifts to sales tax would actually cost many elderly people more than they are paying now. Elderly renters would not save a dime in property taxes or rents to offset sales tax increases.

No income tax increases

Shifting to income tax only saves money for those home owners who retire before or shortly after the time the shift occurs. Young people in many municipalities will pay about twice as much in income tax as they could ever save in property tax.

No dumping on renters

The Foundersí Plan benefits home owners and renters alike. Other proposals decrease burdens on property owners by dumping those burdens on renters. Besides being horribly regressive, such policies induce renters to settle in other states, as they own nothing that they canít take with them.

Local Taxes, Locally Controlled

The Foundersí Plan needs no state funding and is the only plan that local jurisdictions could try without making irreversible commitments. Communities are much more careful with their own tax money than with state money, and state funding leads to state control.

Naturally progressive

Land value tax shifts the burden to commercial property, wealthier neighborhoods and absentee owners, saving money for home owners in poor and middle-income neighborhoods. It coincides naturally with ability to pay, but sales and income taxes do not.

Better Economics

Real estate price stability

States that had cut property taxes saw rampant speculation and boom-bust cycles with wild swings in home prices. The Foundersí Plan protects those who deserve protection without turning homes into tax shelters for speculators.

No breaks for slumlords

Property tax is about the only tax slumlords and speculators pay. Other proposals cut their taxes at the expense of residents. Only the Foundersí Plan relieves residents at the expense of slumlords.

More affordable housing

Wherever property tax has been curtailed, housing prices shot up so much that housing became less affordable. Switching to land value tax puts underused land on the market, increasing the housing supply and thereby lowering housing costs.

No loss of people or businesses

High sales taxes drive businesses across state lines, especially from border communities like Philadelphia, Chester, Easton, Erie, Sharon and New Castle. High income tax drives wealthier residents away. The Foundersí Plan actually attracts people and businesses.

Sensible, market-driven land use

Land value tax promotes redevelopment of urban and inner suburban areas, reduces sprawl, and keeps prices within the reach of ordinary home buyers. Replacing property tax with sales and income taxes leads speculators to gobble up homes as tax shelters, making them too expensive for ordinary citizens to buy.

Better Principles

Based on founding principles

William Penn, Ben Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, Tom Paine and many others called for shifts to land value tax to prevent rich aristocrats from grabbing up all the land as they had done in Europe. They recognized that land value tax would enable ordinary people to get land.

The Articles of Confederation, enacted by the signers the Declaration of Independence, called for even the federal government to be funded from land value tax.

When Tom Paine called for a per capita grant to the elderly from a land value tax, just as Saving Communities is calling for today, he wrote, "it is a right, and not a charity, that I am pleading for."

Endorsed by great leaders

From Abraham Lincoln to Martin Luther King, from William F. Buckley to Ralph Nader, important leaders from across the political spectrum have endorsed shifting from property tax to land value tax. So have modern economists like Paul Samuelson, Milton Friedman, Arthur Laffer and Herb Simon. Shifting to land value tax is without question the most endorsed property tax reform in history.

The Plan

Gradually replace property tax with land value tax

Twenty Pennsylvania taxing jurisdictions have partly shifted their property taxes off improvements (buildings) and onto land values. Most home owners in each jurisdiction pay less, particularly in poorer neighborhoods, and each jurisdiction saw increased construction while the rest of Pennsylvania has continued to decline.

Give per capita grants to the elderly

Each person aged 65 or over would get a per capita grant from local tax revenues. If tax rates have to be raised slightly, younger residents will still pay less than if sales or income taxes replace residential property taxes. (Proposed by Tom Paine.)

Other Founders' Plan Pages

Why the Founders wanted a property tax on land value, and not a sales tax

Home Page
Current Projects
Forensic Index Document Library Using This Site
New Pages and Updates
Copyright Info
Contact Us

We Provide

How You Can Help

  • Research
  • Outreach
  • Transcribing Documents
  • Donating Money
  • Training for Responsibility

Our Constituents

  • Public Officials
  • Small Businesses
  • Family Farms
  • Organic Farms
  • Vegetarians
  • Labor
  • Real Estate Leaders
  • Innovative Land Speculators
  • Homeowners
  • Tenants
  • Ethnic Minorities
  • Ideological Groups

Fundamental Principles

  • Decentralism and Freedom
  • Focusing on Local Reform
  • Government as Referee
  • Government as Public Servant
  • Earth as a Commons
  • Money as a Common Medium
  • Property Derives from Labor

Core Issues

  • Democratic Process
  • Monopoly
  • Debt Money
  • Taxation
  • Privilege

Derivative Issues

  • Wealth Concentration
  • Corruption
  • Bureaucracy
  • Authorities
  • Privatization
  • Centralization
  • Globalization and Trade
  • Economic Stagnation
  • Boom-Bust Cycles
  • Development Subsidies
  • Sprawl
  • Gentrification
  • Pollution and Depletion
  • Public Services
  • Transportation
  • Education
  • Health Care
  • Retirement
  • Wages
  • Zoning
  • Parks
  • Shared Services

Blinding Misconceptions

  • Orwellian Economics
  • Corporate Efficiency
  • Democracy vs. Elections
  • Big Government Solutions
  • Founding Fathers
  • Politics of Fear
  • Politics of Least Resistance
  • Radical vs. Militant
  • Left vs. Right
  • Common vs. Collective
  • Analysis vs. Vilification
  • Influence vs. Power

Saving Communities
631 Melwood Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
United States